|
January 14, 2002, "Performing a Historectomy on America"
January 14, 2002, "Performing a Historectomy on America"
By David C. Stolinsky.
First, let me make clear that I am not referring to a hysterectomy, or removal of the uterus, but a Historectomy, or removal
of our history.
Next, let me explain why this is especially critical for America. To do so, let me contrast America with France.
The area we now call France was settled by Celtic peoples called Gauls in prehistoric times, hundreds or perhaps thousands
of years B.C. The Romans under Caesar invaded and spread Roman customs and law and the Latin language, on which French is
based. The last major addition was the
invasion of the Franks, a Germanic tribe that settled northwestern France and gave the nation its name. This occurred roughly
1,500 years ago. That is, for a millennium and a half, approximately the same people have occupied roughly the same area.
When we talk about France and the French, we know very well what we mean and of whom we speak. Despite all the wars and other
changes of the last 1,500 years, France remains France.
But what of America?
A small strip of the Atlantic coast was settled by Europeans in the late 1500s and early 1600s.
A large chunk of the central continent was added with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, and the Southwest was added in 1848
after the Mexican War. These huge areas were peopled by successive waves of immigrants from many lands, who largely displaced
the Native Americans.
When we talk about America and Americans, we must specify what time we refer to, and which segment of the population we mean.
Unlike older nations, America is a relatively recent invention. Its population shifted over time, and is still shifting because
of continued immigration. Unlike France and many other nations, America is an "idea."
To define America, one cannot merely refer to an ancient land with a predominantly stable population. No, to define America
one must refer to the ideas and ideals on which it is based.
But are we trying to preserve these ideas and hand them down to the next generation? Or are we doing our best to eradicate
these ideas from our collective memory? Are we attempting to induce national amnesia?
Are we, in fact, performing a Historectomy? That is, are we removing the basis of our nation?
When I went to grammar school a half-century ago, we saluted the flag every morning. We were taught patriotic songs for national
holidays. And we enjoyed Christmas and Easter vacations, not winter and spring breaks. After all, the vast majority of Americans,
and all of the founders, identified themselves as Christians.
In junior high, I was required to memorize the Gettysburg Address, the Preamble to the Constitution, and the first and fourth
verses of "The Star-spangled Banner." If you want to learn how a house is constructed, first study the foundation.
In high school, I was required to take American History and Civics, not merely "social studies." We learned about the great
people and great events of our history, and (to a much lesser degree) some of the unhappy events. We learned how a bill becomes
law, and what powers the president and the Supreme Court have.
But there were other ways of learning. I loved movies. I saw "The Story of Alexander Graham Bell," inventor of the telephone.
I saw "Sergeant York," the true story of how a pacifist farmer was convinced that violent evildoers had to be opposed by force,
then went on to win the Medal of Honor. I saw "They Died With Their Boots On," a highly fictionalized account of General Custer,
but at least I learned that he played a key role in our history, which is more than today's kids know.
Later I saw "Boys' Town," the story of Father Flannagan's orphanage. And of course there was "The Fighting Sixty-ninth," depicting
Father Duffy's role in this New York unit's World War I exploits. So when I passed his statue in Times Square, I may have
been the only one on the tour bus who knew who he was - not bad for a Jewish kid who grew up in San Francisco.
But, you see, I was brought up to be an American.
Then there were the John Ford films of the West, where the U.S. Army was depicted in a sympathetic (some might say overly
sympathetic) light. I saw depictions of Abe Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson. I was being entertained at the movies, but I was also
being exposed to my country's past.
Contrast my upbringing with what today's kids are exposed to:
Today's kids read history books and hear lectures that describe America's past as questionable at best, and evil or downright
genocidal at worst.
Today's kids mumble a few of the words to the first verse of the National Anthem at sports events. Forget about the fourth
verse, the one that mentions (gasp!) God.
Today's kids are taught that the founders were deists, not really Christians - that is, if religion is allowed to be
mentioned at all.
Today's kids are lucky to place the Revolution or the Civil War in the right century, much less the right decade.
Today's kids identify Grant as the man on the $50 bill, not the man who led the Union to victory and thereby ended slavery.
Today's kids will not find Adm. Ernest King, our chief of naval operations in World War II, in the Encyclopedia Britannica.
They will find jazz guitarist B.B. King.
One doesn't need an encyclopedia for living musicians; one needs it to learn about heroes of the past who bequeathed us our
freedom. But Adm. King has been excised, along with uncounted other significant figures of our past.
Today's kid's see movies depicting our leaders as scheming warmongers or even assassins (remember Oliver Stone's "JFK"?) and
our military as sadistic morons and oppressors.
Today's kids see clergy depicted as idiots or molesters, if they see them at all, and religion shown as an oppressive and
destructive force, if it is referred to in any way.
Today's kids, and even law students, are taught that the Constitution is a "living document." That is, it has no fixed meaning,
and means whatever a judge says it means today. In effect, kids are taught that we have no Constitution.
In short, the last generation of Americans has been taught little of the foundations of their country. And what they were
taught was often negative. What they saw in movies only served to strengthen this negative impression.
It's no wonder they view America with ambivalence at best, and with open hostility at worst. Is John Walker an aberration,
or just the tip of the iceberg? Only time will tell.
If you want to destroy a house, undermine the foundation.
If you want to destroy a nation, do the same.
If you want to debase people who are defined by ideas, destroy the ideas.
If you want to bring down a society that is sustained by its history, perform a Historectomy.
But be aware that this can be a dangerous operation from which the patient may not recover.
Click here to return to top of page
|
